AMROTEC®

About AMROTEC

Currency Counters

1-Pocket Discriminator

2-Pocket Discriminators

Coin Counters

Coin Sorters

Retail Coin Sorters

Teller Assist Unit

New Product Release

Other Equipment

Press Releases

Patent Related

Prior Arts - Library

Contact AMROTEC

 
Asserted Patents in Texas Patent Suit.
 

Asserted Patent

Suit Status  
Expired On
USPN # 5,966,456 Ruled  Invalid
02/05/2010
USPN # 6,381,354
Ruled Invalid   02/05/2010 

USPN # 6,459,806

Valid, Appeal pending

02/05/2010
USPN # 5,909,503
Valid. Appeal pending 
02/05/2010


List of  other expired patents from 1990 ('111/ '196 family):


Patent

Expired

Expiration Date

First Patent Application
07/475,111
filed Feb 5, 1990
Abandoned 02/05/2010
USPN # 5,295,196 (First Patent)
(issued March 15, 1994)
Yes
03/15/2011
USPN # 6,459,806
(issued Oct 1, 2002)
Yes
02/05/2010
USPN # 5,966,456
(issued Oct 12, 1999)
Yes
02/05/2010
USPN # 6,381,354
(issued April 30, 2002)
Yes
02/05/2010
USPN # 5,909,503
(issued June, 1999)
Yes
02/05/2010
USPN # 5,692,067
(issued Nov 25, 1997)
Yes
03/15/2011

*** The table above only represented Patents that were asserted against AMRO's currency Discriminator Products or most relevant to the TX suit. This table does not represent a complete list of all expired Cummins-Allison patents.

Texas Patent Litigation and Appeal
Updated on 03/15/2011:                

               On August 27, 2007, Cummins-Allison Corp. (“Cummins”) commenced an infringement action against Amro-Asian Trade, Inc. (“Amro”) and it's Korean manufacturer in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.  Cummins alleged that Amro's imported SB1000/SB1100/SB1800 products infringed four patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,459,806 (“the ‘806 patent”), 5,966,456 (“the ‘456 patent”), 5,909,503 (“the ‘503 patent”), and 6,381,354 (“the ‘354 patent”).

                  A Jury Trial was concluded on October 7, 2009 and on October 30, 2009, the District Court of Texas issued a Memorandum and Order enjoined defendants from making, using, or marketing in the United States the SB-series products until February 5, 2010, the expiration date of the these four asserted patents. Further, Court  declared asserted claim 55 of the ‘354 patent and claim 41 of the ‘456 patent invalid, but, upheld validity on '806 and '503 patent.  After post-trial motions, Amro and SBM filed it's notice of appeal at the Federal Circuit Court in Washington D.C seeking reversal of Texas District Court's final rulings on '806 and '503 patents validity and damages awarded.
                On March 11, 2011 Amro and SBM filed their appeal brief timely. Amro expects a decision from Federal Circuit Court in Washington D.C.around October, 2011(projected). More update will follow as our appeal proceed.


Updated on 06/16/2011:
On April 19th, Cummins filed their appeal brief and Cross-Appeal on one of the patent ('354) ruled invalid.

On June 15th, AMRO and SBM filed their response brief to Cummins's brief and Cross-Appeal. 

completed:  
December 7th: Oral Hearing on Appeal at Federal Circuit Court in Washington D.C.
[Parties are waiting for appeal decision from D.C Federal Circuit Court at present time. ] 


REQUEST for Re-Examination of Newly issued Patents

RE-EXAMINATION REQUEST NOTICE (EX-PARTES): 06/11/2011 
AMRO recently initiated further ex-partes re-examination proceedings asking USPTO to examine the below Cummins's patents (Newly issued patents with 4 to 6 years of extention), which were issued from Parent Patent Application '111 or first Patent '196 (filed in 1990 and 1992 respectively), on the ground of Non-Statutory Obvious-type Double-Patentings.
** U.S. Patent # 7,536,046. Filing Date: 05/22/2011. Re-Examination Control No: 90/011703
** U.S. Patent # 7,672,499. Filing Date: 06/11/2011. Re-Examination Control No: 90/011719


PTO ORDERED RE-EXAMINATION: 07/25/2011
PTO ordered re-examination of both patents (# 7,536,046 and # 7,672,499) on the ground of
non-statutory obvious type double patenting.

PTO ISSUED FIRST OFFICE-ACTION: 01/13/2012

PTO issued Non-Final Office Action for both patents (# 7,536,046 and # 7,672,499) rejecting all claims under reexamination on the ground of non-statutory obvious type double patenting.


Document Library

NameDescription
DocumentAMRO's REQUEST_046 PatentAMRO's Request for Ex-Partes Reexamination on Patent '046 on the Gound for Non-Statutory Obvious Type Double Patenting issue.
DocumentPTO Order_Order Granting ReexaminationBased on AMRO's Request, PTO ordered Reexamination of Newly issued '046 Patent on the basis of Non-Statutory obvious type Double Patenting issues.
DocumentPatent_7536046_Office ActionUS Patent office CRU unit issued first Office Action rejecting all claims under Reexamination on the basis of Non-Statutory obvious type Double Patenting.

Document Library

NameDescription
DocumentAMRO's REQUEST_499 PatentAMRO's Request for Ex-Partes Re-Examination of '499 Patent on basis of Non-Statutory Obvious Type Double Patenting.
DocumentPTO Order - Order Granting ReexaminationBased on AMRO's Request, PTO ordered Reexamination of newly issued '499 Patent on the Ground for Non-Statutory Obvious Type Double Patenting.
DocumentUS Patent 7672499_Office ActionUS Patent office CRU unit issued first Office Action rejecting all 110 claims of the Patent on the basis of Non-Statutory obvious type Double Patenting.
 
AMROTEC® is a Registered TradeMark of Amro-Asian Trade, Inc. USA
Copyright© Amro-Asian Trade, Inc 2011. All rights Reserved. Last modified on Jan, 2012

AMROTEC® Coin & Cash Handling Equipment